You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a Biosensor-Based Rapid Urine Test for Detection of Urogenital Schistosomiasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003845 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen E. Mach, Ruchika Mohan, Shailja Patel, Pak Kin Wong, Michael Hsieh, Joseph C. Liao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| Croatia | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 9 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,443,731
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#3,674
of 9,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,049
of 277,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#80
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.