↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Fate and transport of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in surface waters of agricultural basins

Overview of attention for article published in Pest Management Science, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Policy documents Twitter Facebook Google+ Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fate and transport of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in surface waters of agricultural basins
Published in
Pest Management Science, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/ps.2212
Pubmed ID
21681915
Authors

Richard H Coupe, Stephen J Kalkhoff, Paul D Capel, Caroline Gregoire

Abstract

Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] is a herbicide used widely throughout the world in the production of many crops and is heavily used on soybeans, corn and cotton. Glyphosate is used in almost all agricultural areas of the United States, and the agricultural use of glyphosate has increased from less than 10 000 Mg in 1992 to more than 80 000 Mg in 2007. The greatest intensity of glyphosate use is in the midwestern United States, where applications are predominantly to genetically modified corn and soybeans. In spite of the increase in usage across the United States, the characterization of the transport of glyphosate and its degradate aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) on a watershed scale is lacking.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 261 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 21%
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 9%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 35 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 33%
Environmental Science 64 24%
Chemistry 26 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 46 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,874,078
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Pest Management Science
#133
of 2,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,857
of 100,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pest Management Science
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.