You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ranking hospitals on avoidable death rates derived from retrospective case record review: methodological observations and limitations
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004366 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gary Abel, Georgios Lyratzopoulos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 32% |
United States | 3 | 12% |
Spain | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
Scientists | 5 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 21% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 26% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,325,946
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#947
of 2,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,767
of 276,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#35
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.