↓ Skip to main content

Ranking hospitals on avoidable death rates derived from retrospective case record review: methodological observations and limitations

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ranking hospitals on avoidable death rates derived from retrospective case record review: methodological observations and limitations
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, July 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004366
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary Abel, Georgios Lyratzopoulos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Mathematics 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#972,748
of 13,754,665 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#601
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,420
of 231,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,754,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.