You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ngLOC: an n-gram-based Bayesian method for estimating the subcellular proteomes of eukaryotes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r68 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian R King, Chittibabu Guda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 50% |
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,977,154
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,324
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,912
of 162,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#77
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.