↓ Skip to main content

Human methyl parathion poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Toxicology (15563650), January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 policy source


14 Dimensions

Readers on

14 Mendeley
Human methyl parathion poisoning
Published in
Clinical Toxicology (15563650), January 2009
DOI 10.1080/15563650701232745
Pubmed ID

Geoffrey K. Isbister, Katie Mills, Lena E. Friberg, Mary Hodge, Enda O'Connor, Renu Patel, Manel Abeyewardene, Michael Eddleston

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 36%
Student > Master 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Chemistry 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Other 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2009.
All research outputs
of 3,971,775 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 72,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,971,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.