↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the healthcare costs of treating severely bleeding major trauma patients: a national study for England

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
41 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying the healthcare costs of treating severely bleeding major trauma patients: a national study for England
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0987-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen E. Campbell, Elizabeth A. Stokes, Danielle N. Bargo, Nicola Curry, Fiona E. Lecky, Antoinette Edwards, Maralyn Woodford, Frances Seeney, Simon Eaglestone, Karim Brohi, Alastair M. Gray, Simon J. Stanworth

Abstract

Severely bleeding trauma patients are a small proportion of the major trauma population but account for 40 % of all trauma deaths. Health care resource use and costs are likely to be substantial but have not been fully quantified. Knowledge of costs is essential for developing targeted cost reduction strategies, informing health policy, and ensuring the cost-effectiveness of interventions. In collaboration with the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) detailed patient-level data on in-hospital resource use, extended care at hospital discharge, and readmissions to 12 months post-injury were collected on 441 consecutive adult major trauma patients with severe bleeding presenting at 22 hospitals (21 in England and 1 in Wales). Resource use data were costed using national unit costs and mean costs estimated for the cohort and for clinically relevant sub-groups. Using nationally available data on trauma presentations in England, patient-level cost estimates were up-scaled to a national level. The mean (95 % CI) total cost of initial hospital inpatient care was £19,770 (£18,177 to £21,364) per patient, of which 62 % was attributable to ventilation, intensive care and ward stays, 16 % to surgery, and 12 % to blood component transfusion. Nursing home and rehabilitation unit care and re-admissions to hospital increased the cost to £20,591 (£18,924 to £22,257). Costs were significantly higher for more severely injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score > =15) and those with blunt injuries. Cost estimates for England were £148.3 m, with over a third of this cost attributable to patients aged 65 years and over. Severely bleeding major trauma patients are a high cost sub-group of all major trauma patients and the cost burden is projected to rise further as a consequence of an aging population and as evidence continues to emerge on the benefits of early and simultaneous administration of blood products in pre-specified ratios. The findings from this study provide a previously unreported baseline from which the potential impact of changes to service provision and / or treatment practice can begin to be evaluated. Further studies are still required to determine the full costs of post-discharge care requirements which are also likely to be substantial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 22%
Researcher 24 17%
Other 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 33 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,274,863
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,079
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,215
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#62
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.