↓ Skip to main content

Opinion: Endogenizing culture in sustainability science research and policy

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opinion: Endogenizing culture in sustainability science research and policy
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1510010112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcellus M. Caldas, Matthew R. Sanderson, Martha Mather, Melinda D. Daniels, Jason S. Bergtold, Joseph Aistrup, Jessica L. Heier Stamm, David Haukos, Kyle Douglas-Mankin, Aleksey Y. Sheshukov, David Lopez-Carr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Belgium 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 27%
Student > Master 23 21%
Researcher 17 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Professor 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 36 33%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Engineering 10 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 18 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#917,157
of 17,145,811 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#14,780
of 88,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,124
of 237,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#297
of 944 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,145,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 944 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.