↓ Skip to main content

Opinion: Endogenizing culture in sustainability science research and policy

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Opinion: Endogenizing culture in sustainability science research and policy
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1510010112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcellus M. Caldas, Matthew R. Sanderson, Martha Mather, Melinda D. Daniels, Jason S. Bergtold, Joseph Aistrup, Jessica L. Heier Stamm, David Haukos, Kyle Douglas-Mankin, Aleksey Y. Sheshukov, David Lopez-Carr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
South Africa 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 79 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 31%
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Unspecified 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 33%
Unspecified 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Engineering 8 9%
Other 14 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#501,225
of 12,365,234 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9,747
of 77,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,153
of 240,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#304
of 1,032 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,365,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,032 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.