The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cancer surgery: risks and opportunities
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioEssays, March 2006
|
DOI | 10.1002/bies.20381 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J.C. Coffey, M.J.F. Smith, J.H. Wang, D. Bouchier‐Hayes, T.G. Cotter, H.P. Redmond |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 17% |
Chemical Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,296,731
of 24,821,035 outputs
Outputs from BioEssays
#1,318
of 2,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,212
of 89,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioEssays
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,821,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.