↓ Skip to main content

Cardioselective beta-blockers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardioselective beta-blockers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003566.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shelley R Salpeter, Thomas M Ormiston, Edwin E Salpeter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 100%
United States 2 100%
United Kingdom 2 100%
Denmark 1 50%
Italy 1 50%
Netherlands 1 50%
Germany 1 50%
New Zealand 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 950%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 600%
Student > Master 9 450%
Unspecified 7 350%
Other 7 350%
Other 27 1350%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 2850%
Unspecified 11 550%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 200%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 150%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 100%
Other 4 200%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#950,389
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,767
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,406
of 231,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.