↓ Skip to main content

Response to: the nature of evidence for and against epigenetic inheritance

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to: the nature of evidence for and against epigenetic inheritance
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-015-0714-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piroska E. Szabó

Abstract

We thank Dr. Nadeau for his interest in our work. Dr. Nadeau has raised concerns about the experimental approach (mouse strains, route of administration, lack of phenotypic assessment) and about the validity of our conclusions. We will respond to each of these concerns point-by point.Please see related article: www.dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0709-y.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Mexico 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 24%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,632,189
of 15,049,257 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#2,867
of 3,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,898
of 232,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,049,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.