Chapter title |
Determination of Cadmium in Biological Samples
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 4 |
Book title |
Cadmium: From Toxicity to Essentiality
|
Published in |
Metal ions in life sciences, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-94-007-5179-8_4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-9-40-075178-1, 978-9-40-075179-8
|
Authors |
Katrin Klotz, Wobbeke Weistenhöfer, Hans Drexler, Klotz, Katrin, Weistenhöfer, Wobbeke, Drexler, Hans |
Abstract |
Analyses of cadmium concentrations in biological material are performed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), but also electrochemical methods, neutron activation analysis (NAA), and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF). The predominant sample matrices include blood, plasma, serum, and urine, as well as hair, saliva, and tissue of kidney cortex, lung, and liver. While cadmium in blood reveals rather the recent exposure situation, cadmium in urine reflects the body burden and is an indicator for the cumulative long term exposure.After chronic exposure, cadmium accumulates in the human body and causes kidney diseases, especially lesions of proximal tubular cells. A tubular proteinuria causes an increase in urinary excretion of microproteins. Excretions of retinol binding protein (RBP), β2-microglobulin (β2-M), and α1-microglobulin are validated biomarkers for analyzing cadmium effects. For this purpose, immunological procedures such as ELISA, and radio- and latex-immunoassays are used.However, proteinuria is not specific to cadmium, but can also occur after exposure to other nephrotoxic agents or due to various kidney diseases. In summary, cadmium in urine and blood are the most specific biomarkers of cadmium exposure. A combination of parameters of exposure (cadmium in blood, cadmium in urine) and parameters of effect (e.g., β2-M, RBP) is required to reveal cadmium-induced nephrological effects. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 26% |
Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 8 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 23% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |