↓ Skip to main content

Cadmium: From Toxicity to Essentiality

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 14: Toxicology of Cadmium and Its Damage to Mammalian Organs
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 135)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Toxicology of Cadmium and Its Damage to Mammalian Organs
Chapter number 14
Book title
Cadmium: From Toxicity to Essentiality
Published in
Metal ions in life sciences, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5179-8_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-075178-1, 978-9-40-075179-8
Authors

Frank Thévenod, Wing-Kee Lee, Thévenod, Frank, Lee, Wing-Kee

Abstract

The detrimental health effects of cadmium (Cd) were first described in the mid 19th century. As part of industrial developments, increasing usage of Cd has led to widespread contamination of the environment that threatens human health, particularly today. Rather than acute, lethal exposures, the real challenge in the 21st century in a global setting seems to be chronic low Cd exposure (CLCE), mainly from dietary sources. Ubiquity of Cd makes it a serious environmental health problem that needs to be thoroughly assessed because it already affects or will affect large proportions of the world's population. CLCE is a health problem that affects increasingly organ toxicity, especially nephrotoxicity, without a known threshold, implying that there is currently no safe limit for CLCE. In this chapter, we summarize current knowledge on the sources of Cd in the environment, describe the entry pathways for Cd into mammalian organisms, sum up the major organs targeted by acute or chronic Cd exposure and review the impact of Cd on organ function and human health. We also aim to put early pioneering studies on Cd poisoning into perspective in the context of recent ground-breaking prospective long-term population studies, which link CLCE to leading causes of diseases in modern societies - cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, and of state-of-the-art studies detailing cellular and molecular mechanisms of acute and chronic Cd toxicity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Environmental Science 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Chemistry 7 8%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,731,211
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Metal ions in life sciences
#47
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,631
of 403,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metal ions in life sciences
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.