↓ Skip to main content

Cadmium: From Toxicity to Essentiality

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Cadmium(II) Complexes of Amino Acids and Peptides
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 134)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cadmium(II) Complexes of Amino Acids and Peptides
Chapter number 9
Book title
Cadmium: From Toxicity to Essentiality
Published in
Metal ions in life sciences, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5179-8_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-075178-1, 978-9-40-075179-8
Authors

Imre Sóvágó, Katalin Várnagy

Abstract

Cadmium(II) ions form complexes with all natural amino acids and peptides. The thermodynamic stabilities of the cadmium(II) complexes of the most common amino acids and peptides are generally lower than those of the corresponding zinc(II) complexes, except the complexes of thiolate ligands. The coordination geometry of the cadmium(II) amino acid complexes is generally octahedral with the involvement of the amino and carboxylate groups in metal binding. In the case of simple peptides, both octahedral and tetrahedral complexes can be formed depending on the steric conditions. The terminal amino group and the subsequent carbonyl-O atom are the primary binding sites and there is no example for cadmium(II)-induced peptide amide deprotonation and coordination. The various hydrophobic and polar side chains do not have a significant impact on the structural and thermodynamic parameters of cadmium(II) complexes of amino acids and peptides. β-carboxylate function of aspartic acid and imidazole-N donors of histidyl residues slightly enhance the thermodynamic stability of cadmium(II)-peptide complexes. The most remarkable effects of side chains are, however, connected to the involvement of thiolate residues in cadmium(II) binding. Stability constants of the cadmium(II) complexes of both L-cysteine and its peptides and related ligands are significantly higher than those of the zinc(II) complexes. Thiolate donor functions can be bridging ligands too, resulting in the formation of polynuclear cadmium(II) complexes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 30%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Metal ions in life sciences
#47
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,266
of 280,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metal ions in life sciences
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.