↓ Skip to main content

An assembly and alignment-free method of phylogeny reconstruction from next-generation sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An assembly and alignment-free method of phylogeny reconstruction from next-generation sequencing data
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1647-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huan Fan, Anthony R. Ives, Yann Surget-Groba, Charles H. Cannon

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing technologies are rapidly generating whole-genome datasets for an increasing number of organisms. However, phylogenetic reconstruction of genomic data remains difficult because de novo assembly for non-model genomes and multi-genome alignment are challenging. To greatly simplify the analysis, we present an Assembly and Alignment-Free (AAF) method ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/aaf-phylogeny ) that constructs phylogenies directly from unassembled genome sequence data, bypassing both genome assembly and alignment. Using mathematical calculations, models of sequence evolution, and simulated sequencing of published genomes, we address both evolutionary and sampling issues caused by direct reconstruction, including homoplasy, sequencing errors, and incomplete sequencing coverage. From these results, we calculate the statistical properties of the pairwise distances between genomes, allowing us to optimize parameter selection and perform bootstrapping. As a test case with real data, we successfully reconstructed the phylogeny of 12 mammals using raw sequencing reads. We also applied AAF to 21 tropical tree genome datasets with low coverage to demonstrate its effectiveness on non-model organisms. Our AAF method opens up phylogenomics for species without an appropriate reference genome or high sequence coverage, and rapidly creates a phylogenetic framework for further analysis of genome structure and diversity among non-model organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 225 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 28%
Researcher 50 21%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 27 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 22%
Computer Science 28 12%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 35 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,673,580
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,911
of 10,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,596
of 264,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#45
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.