↓ Skip to main content

Effect of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides for ICAM‐1 on renal ischaemia–reperfusion injury in the anaesthetised rat

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiology, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
39 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides for ICAM‐1 on renal ischaemia–reperfusion injury in the anaesthetised rat
Published in
Journal of Physiology, June 2004
DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.061788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lik Voon Kiew, Abdul Sattar Munavvar, Chung Hiong Law, Abdullah Nor Azizan, Abdul Rahman Nazarina, Khalifah Sidik, Edward J. Johns

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiology
#3,979
of 9,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,917
of 62,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiology
#21
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.