You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cpipe: a shared variant detection pipeline designed for diagnostic settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-015-0191-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon P. Sadedin, Harriet Dashnow, Paul A. James, Melanie Bahlo, Denis C. Bauer, Andrew Lonie, Sebastian Lunke, Ivan Macciocca, Jason P. Ross, Kirby R. Siemering, Zornitza Stark, Susan M. White, Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Graham Taylor, Clara Gaff, Alicia Oshlack, Natalie P. Thorne |
| Abstract |
The benefits of implementing high throughput sequencing in the clinic are quickly becoming apparent. However, few freely available bioinformatics pipelines have been built from the ground up with clinical genomics in mind. Here we present Cpipe, a pipeline designed specifically for clinical genetic disease diagnostics. Cpipe was developed by the Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, an Australian initiative to promote common approaches to genomics across healthcare institutions. As such, Cpipe has been designed to provide fast, effective and reproducible analysis, while also being highly flexible and customisable to meet the individual needs of diverse clinical settings. Cpipe is being shared with the clinical sequencing community as an open source project and is available at http://cpipeline.org. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 23% |
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 20 | 77% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,445,138
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#317
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,598
of 262,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.