↓ Skip to main content

Fire frequency and biodiversity conservation in Australian tropical savannas: implications from the Kapalga fire experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Austral Ecology, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,143)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fire frequency and biodiversity conservation in Australian tropical savannas: implications from the Kapalga fire experiment
Published in
Austral Ecology, April 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01441.x
Authors

ALAN N. ANDERSEN, GARRY D. COOK, LAURIE K. CORBETT, MICHAEL M. DOUGLAS, ROBERT W. EAGER, JEREMY RUSSELL-SMITH, SAMANTHA A. SETTERFIELD, RICHARD J. WILLIAMS, JOHN C. Z. WOINARSKI

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 10 3%
Australia 6 2%
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 327 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 19%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Postgraduate 26 7%
Other 72 20%
Unknown 34 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 139 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 4%
Social Sciences 5 1%
Engineering 3 <1%
Other 15 4%
Unknown 47 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#587,047
of 19,852,973 outputs
Outputs from Austral Ecology
#27
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,311
of 241,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Austral Ecology
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,852,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.