↓ Skip to main content

Effects of ozonated autohemotherapy on the antioxidant capacity of Thoroughbred horses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of ozonated autohemotherapy on the antioxidant capacity of Thoroughbred horses
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1292/jvms.15-0225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nao TSUZUKI, Yoshiro ENDO, Lisa KIKKAWA, Kenji KOROSUE, Yasuyuki KANEKO, Akira KITAUCHI, Hiromu KATAMOTO, Yuichi HIDAKA, Mitsuyoshi HAGIO, Shidow TORISU

Abstract

The performance of horses undergoing regular intense exercise is adversely affected by oxidative stress. Thus, it is important to increase antioxidant production in horses in order to reduce oxidative stress. Ozonated autohemotherapy (OAHT) reportedly promotes antioxidant production. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of OAHT on antioxidant capacity. Ten Thoroughbred horses were used in this study. After the OAHT, we collected serum samples and measured biological antioxidant potential (BAP). We found that BAP began to increase after the OAHT and was significantly higher in the OAHT group than at 3 (P<0.01) and 7 days (P<0.05) after OAHT than in the control group at 3 and 7 days after starting collection of blood samples. Therefore, it was shown that OAHT improved the antioxidant capacity of the horses.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 20%
Unspecified 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Unspecified 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 3 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,319,157
of 12,455,442 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#453
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,751
of 232,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,455,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.