You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-biological synthetic spike-in controls and the AMPtk software pipeline improve mycobiome data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PeerJ, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj.4925 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan M. Palmer, Michelle A. Jusino, Mark T. Banik, Daniel L. Lindner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 34% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 30 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 23 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 24% |
| Researcher | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,263,093
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#1,277
of 15,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,824
of 346,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#60
of 591 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 591 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.