You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Supplemental Vitamins and Minerals for CVD Prevention and Treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.020 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David J.A. Jenkins, J. David Spence, Edward L. Giovannucci, Young-in Kim, Robert Josse, Reinhold Vieth, Sonia Blanco Mejia, Effie Viguiliouk, Stephanie Nishi, Sandhya Sahye-Pudaruth, Melanie Paquette, Darshna Patel, Sandy Mitchell, Meaghan Kavanagh, Tom Tsirakis, Lina Bachiri, Atherai Maran, Narmada Umatheva, Taylor McKay, Gelaine Trinidad, Daniel Bernstein, Awad Chowdhury, Julieta Correa-Betanzo, Gabriella Del Principe, Anisa Hajizadeh, Rohit Jayaraman, Amy Jenkins, Wendy Jenkins, Ruben Kalaichandran, Geithayini Kirupaharan, Preveena Manisekaran, Tina Qutta, Ramsha Shahid, Alexis Silver, Cleo Villegas, Jessica White, Cyril W.C. Kendall, Sathish C. Pichika, John L. Sievenpiper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 870 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 106 | 12% |
Japan | 100 | 11% |
Spain | 54 | 6% |
Canada | 32 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 24 | 3% |
France | 15 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 14 | 2% |
Germany | 12 | 1% |
Australia | 12 | 1% |
Other | 108 | 12% |
Unknown | 393 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 705 | 81% |
Scientists | 86 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 64 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 358 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 50 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 45 | 13% |
Other | 41 | 11% |
Researcher | 37 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 7% |
Other | 59 | 16% |
Unknown | 100 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 4% |
Other | 53 | 15% |
Unknown | 115 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,308
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#9
of 16,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60
of 344,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#1
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.