You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Installing artificial macropores in degraded soils to enhance vertical infiltration and increase soil carbon content
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2014
Yasushi Mori, Atsushi Fujihara, Kazuto Yamagishi
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||6||19%|
|Student > Master||5||16%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||16%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||3||9%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||3%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 353,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.