You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fusing concurrent EEG–fMRI with dynamic causal modeling: Application to effective connectivity during face perception
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroImage, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinh T. Nguyen, Michael Breakspear, Ross Cunnington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 26% |
| Researcher | 49 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 58 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 39 | 18% |
| Engineering | 25 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#9,984
of 12,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,958
of 208,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#114
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.