↓ Skip to main content

A Case of Gastrorrhexis Caused by Ingestion Liquid Nitrogen.

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2612 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Case of Gastrorrhexis Caused by Ingestion Liquid Nitrogen.
Published in
Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery, January 2000
DOI 10.5833/jjgs.33.1648
Authors

Yasunori Yaegashi, Fumie Nakajima, Nobuyuki Hosoi, Haruhiko Fukuta, Masahiro Sase

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,612 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 574. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#12,188
of 13,410,866 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
#1
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188
of 187,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,410,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 37 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them