You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Population correlates of rapid captive‐induced maladaptation in a wild fish
|
---|---|
Published in |
Evolutionary Applications, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.1111/eva.12649 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dylan J. Fraser, Lisa Walker, Matthew C. Yates, Kia Marin, Jacquelyn L. A. Wood, Thais A. Bernos, Carol Zastavniouk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 9 | 38% |
United States | 5 | 21% |
Finland | 2 | 8% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 15 | 63% |
Members of the public | 9 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
Researcher | 7 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,458,003
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Applications
#338
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,148
of 341,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Applications
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.