You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Checklist de Cladocera de água doce do Estado de São Paulo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biota Neotropica, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1676-06032011000500024 |
Authors |
Odete Rocha, Maria José Santos-Wisniewski, Takako Matsumura-Tundisi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 35% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 57% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,795,137
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#23
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,175
of 240,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.