You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Types, Roles, and Practices of Documentation in Data Analytics Open Source Software Libraries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10606-018-9333-1 |
| Authors |
R. Stuart Geiger, Nelle Varoquaux, Charlotte Mazel-Cabasse, Chris Holdgraf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 35% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| France | 3 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
| Scientists | 8 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 16 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,086,234
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#7
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,999
of 347,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.