↓ Skip to main content

The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,417)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
132 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12961-018-0320-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny Moberg, Andrew D. Oxman, Sarah Rosenbaum, Holger J. Schünemann, Gordon Guyatt, Signe Flottorp, Claire Glenton, Simon Lewin, Angela Morelli, Gabriel Rada, Pablo Alonso-Coello, for the GRADE Working Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 269 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 17%
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 73 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Engineering 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 90 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#431,689
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#16
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,354
of 346,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.