| Title |
Potential role of bird predation in the dispersal of otherwise flightless stick insects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.2230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenji Suetsugu, Shoichi Funaki, Asuka Takahashi, Katsura Ito, Takeshi Yokoyama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,233 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 600 | 27% |
| China | 10 | <1% |
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 5 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 5 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 4 | <1% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1563 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2213 | 99% |
| Scientists | 14 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1056. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,069
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#6
of 6,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269
of 345,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#1
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.