↓ Skip to main content

Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, and Binge Eating Disorder in Midlife and Beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, and Binge Eating Disorder in Midlife and Beyond
Published in
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, August 2015
DOI 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roni Elran-Barak, Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft, Yael Benyamini, Scott J. Crow, Carol B. Peterson, Laura L. Hill, Ross D. Crosby, James E. Mitchell, Daniel Le Grange

Abstract

We examined eating disorders in midlife and beyond by comparing frequency of anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED), and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) among midlife eating disorder treatment-seeking individuals and younger controls. We also compared demographic and eating disorder-related characteristics across diagnoses and age groups. Participants included 2,118 treatment-seeking adults who self-reported their eating-related symptoms on the Eating Disorder Questionnaire. Results showed that percent of patients with BN was significantly lower whereas percent of patients with BED and OSFED was significantly higher among midlife relative to younger patients. Percent of patients with AN did not differ between midlife and younger patients. Additionally, midlife and younger patients with BED and OSFED differed on several demographic (e.g., marital status) and eating disorder-related characteristics (e.g., BMI, compulsive exercising). This study suggests that BN is less common whereas BED and OSFED are more common among midlife eating disorder treatment-seeking individuals relative to younger controls. In addition, AN and BN present fairly similarly whereas BED and OSFED present fairly differently among midlife patients relative to younger controls. Attention to these differences and similarities is necessary to understand eating disorders in midlife.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Engineering 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,754,411
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#484
of 3,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,906
of 276,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.