↓ Skip to main content

A Paleolithic diet confers higher insulin sensitivity, lower C-reactive protein and lower blood pressure than a cereal-based diet in domestic pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 1,003)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Paleolithic diet confers higher insulin sensitivity, lower C-reactive protein and lower blood pressure than a cereal-based diet in domestic pigs
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, November 2006
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-3-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tommy Jönsson, Bo Ahrén, Giovanni Pacini, Frank Sundler, Nils Wierup, Stig Steen, Trygve Sjöberg, Martin Ugander, Johan Frostegård, Leif Göransson, Staffan Lindeberg

Abstract

A Paleolithic diet has been suggested to be more in concordance with human evolutionary legacy than a cereal based diet. This might explain the lower incidence among hunter-gatherers of diseases of affluence such as type 2 diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to experimentally study the long-term effect of a Paleolithic diet on risk factors for these diseases in domestic pigs. We examined glucose tolerance, post-challenge insulin response, plasma C-reactive protein and blood pressure after 15 months on Paleolithic diet in comparison with a cereal based swine feed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Sweden 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 141 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Researcher 21 13%
Other 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 25%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 19 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#144,086
of 25,047,899 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#21
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177
of 86,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,047,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them