Title |
Cross‐cultural differences in object recognition: Comparing asylum seekers from Sub‐Saharan Africa and a matched Western European control group
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Cognitive Psychology, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1002/acp.3419 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gabi de Bruïne, Annelies Vredeveldt, Peter J. van Koppen |
Abstract |
Nowadays, more and more people report about their memories in cross-cultural contexts. In international criminal settings and asylum procedures, object recognition tests can provide valuable information, for example, about weapons used during a crime or landmarks from the claimed region of origin. This study was the first to compare object recognition performance by asylum seekers from Sub-Saharan Africa to a matched Western European control group. African participants performed worse than European participants on perceptual tests involving transformations from two- to three-dimensional representations, but both groups performed equally well on an object recognition test that involved transformation from three- to two-dimensional representations. However, African participants were significantly more likely to respond "yes" on the recognition test (i.e., an acquiescence response style) than European participants. Our findings elucidate cultural differences in responding on an object recognition test. Judges, juries, and immigration officials would be wise to take these differences into account when evaluating recognition performance in cross-cultural contexts. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Singapore | 1 | 13% |
Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 23% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 11 | 42% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |