You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biochemical and physiological bases for the use of carbon and nitrogen isotopes in environmental and ecological studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40645-015-0032-y |
| Authors |
Naohiko Ohkouchi, Nanako O Ogawa, Yoshito Chikaraishi, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Eitaro Wada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 22% |
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 42 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 31 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,340,005
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#355
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,892
of 352,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.