↓ Skip to main content

Statistical guidelines for assessing marine avian hotspots and coldspots: A case study on wind energy development in the U.S. Atlantic Ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical guidelines for assessing marine avian hotspots and coldspots: A case study on wind energy development in the U.S. Atlantic Ocean
Published in
Biological Conservation, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.035
Authors

Elise F. Zipkin, Brian P. Kinlan, Allison Sussman, Diana Rypkema, Mark Wimer, Allan F. O'Connell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Namibia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 40%
Environmental Science 17 38%
Energy 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,423,351
of 14,454,606 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,414
of 4,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,628
of 235,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#32
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,454,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.