↓ Skip to main content

Heparin and heparan sulfate increase the radius of diffusion and action of basic fibroblast growth factor.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, October 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heparin and heparan sulfate increase the radius of diffusion and action of basic fibroblast growth factor.
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, October 1990
DOI 10.1083/jcb.111.4.1651
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Flaumenhaft, D Moscatelli, D B Rifkin

Abstract

The radius of diffusion of basic FGF (bFGF) in the presence and in the absence of the glycosaminoglycans heparin and heparan sulfate was measured. Iodinated 125I-bFGF diffuses further in agarose, fibrin, and on a monolayer of bovine aortic endothelial (BAE) cells in the presence of heparin than in its absence. Heparan sulfates affected the diffusion of 125I-bFGF in a manner similar to, though less pronounced than, heparin. When applied at the center of a monolayer of BAE cells, bFGF plus heparin stimulated morphological changes at a 10-fold greater radius than bFGF alone. These results suggest that bFGF-heparin and/or heparan sulfate complexes may be more effective than bFGF alone in stimulating cells located away from the bFGF source because the bFGF-glycosaminoglycan complex partitions into the soluble phase rather than binding to insoluble glycosaminoglycans in the extracellular matrix. Thus, the complex of bFGF and glycosaminoglycan may represent one of the active forms of bFGF in vivo.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Engineering 2 6%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,388,660
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#1,369
of 11,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#451
of 15,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.