↓ Skip to main content

On the lognormality of historical magnetic storm intensity statistics: Implications for extreme-event probabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the lognormality of historical magnetic storm intensity statistics: Implications for extreme-event probabilities
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, August 2015
DOI 10.1002/2015gl064842
Authors

Jeffrey J. Love, E. Joshua Rigler, Antti Pulkkinen, Pete Riley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 23 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 30%
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Master 4 15%
Unspecified 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 13 48%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 26%
Unspecified 4 15%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,943,643
of 12,342,171 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#7,120
of 12,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,613
of 242,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#143
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,171 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.