↓ Skip to main content

On the lognormality of historical magnetic storm intensity statistics: Implications for extreme‐event probabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the lognormality of historical magnetic storm intensity statistics: Implications for extreme‐event probabilities
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, August 2015
DOI 10.1002/2015gl064842
Authors

Jeffrey J. Love, E. Joshua Rigler, Antti Pulkkinen, Pete Riley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 37 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 24%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2015.
All research outputs
#13,950,048
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#12,909
of 19,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,788
of 266,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#168
of 329 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 329 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.