You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genome-scale mapping of DNase I sensitivity in vivo using tiling DNA microarrays
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, June 2006
|
DOI | 10.1038/nmeth890 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter J Sabo, Michael S Kuehn, Robert Thurman, Brett E Johnson, Ericka M Johnson, Hua Cao, Man Yu, Elizabeth Rosenzweig, Jeff Goldy, Andrew Haydock, Molly Weaver, Anthony Shafer, Kristin Lee, Fidencio Neri, Richard Humbert, Michael A Singer, Todd A Richmond, Michael O Dorschner, Michael McArthur, Michael Hawrylycz, Roland D Green, Patrick A Navas, William S Noble, John A Stamatoyannopoulos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 239 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 29% |
Researcher | 66 | 25% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 23 | 9% |
Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
Other | 34 | 13% |
Unknown | 29 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 120 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 68 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 4% |
Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 6% |
Unknown | 34 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,856,217
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#3,133
of 5,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,010
of 64,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.