You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evolved biocultural beings (who invented computers)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01047 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Louise Barrett, Thomas V. Pollet, Gert Stulp |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Austria | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 21 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 28% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 14 | 56% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 20% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 8% |
Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,930,522
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,958
of 29,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,200
of 263,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#272
of 573 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 573 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.