↓ Skip to main content

Fast algorithms for computing sequence distances by exhaustive substring composition

Overview of attention for article published in Algorithms for Molecular Biology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 264)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fast algorithms for computing sequence distances by exhaustive substring composition
Published in
Algorithms for Molecular Biology, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1748-7188-3-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Apostolico, Olgert Denas

Abstract

The increasing throughput of sequencing raises growing needs for methods of sequence analysis and comparison on a genomic scale, notably, in connection with phylogenetic tree reconstruction. Such needs are hardly fulfilled by the more traditional measures of sequence similarity and distance, like string edit and gene rearrangement, due to a mixture of epistemological and computational problems. Alternative measures, based on the subword composition of sequences, have emerged in recent years and proved to be both fast and effective in a variety of tested cases. The common denominator of such measures is an underlying information theoretic notion of relative compressibility. Their viability depends critically on computational cost. The present paper describes as a paradigm the extension and efficient implementation of one of the methods in this class. The method is based on the comparison of the frequencies of all subwords in the two input sequences, where frequencies are suitably adjusted to take into account the statistical background.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Finland 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,928,826
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Algorithms for Molecular Biology
#19
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,275
of 91,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithms for Molecular Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them