↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of five parasitological techniques for laboratory diagnosis of Balantidium coli cysts

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of five parasitological techniques for laboratory diagnosis of Balantidium coli cysts
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, August 2016
DOI 10.1590/s1984-29612016044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alynne da Silva Barbosa, Otilio Machado Pereira Bastos, Claudia Maria Antunes Uchôa, Alcides Pissinatti, Augusto César Machado Pereira Bastos, Igo Vieira de Souza, Laís Verdan Dib, Eduarda Peixoto Azevedo, Mayara Perlingeiro de Siqueira, Matheus Lessa Cardozo, Maria Regina Reis Amendoeira

Abstract

Balantidium coli is a protozoon that can cause dysentery in humans, pigs and nonhuman primates, with zoonotic potential. In the literature, there is still little information on the effectiveness of different laboratory techniques for diagnosing this disease. This study compared and evaluated the performance of the Lutz, modified Ritchie, Faust, modified Sheather and direct examination techniques for detecting cysts of this protozoon. Between 2012 and 2014, 1905 fecal samples were collected from captive animals in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Of these, 790 were obtained from the rectum of pigs and 1115 from enclosures occupied by nonhuman primates. B. coli cysts were most evident through direct examination (22.4% of the samples) and the Lutz technique (21%). Fair agreement (Kappa = 0.41; p < 0.05) was observed only between direct examination and Lutz. The flotation techniques (Faust and modified Sheather) did not show good recovery of cysts. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the frequency of cysts between pigs and nonhuman primates could only be observed through direct examination and the Lutz technique. The most efficient method for diagnosing this parasitosis was seen to an association between direct examination and the spontaneous sedimentation technique.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Unknown 20 83%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,001,030
of 21,562,248 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
#32
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,850
of 300,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,562,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.