↓ Skip to main content

Better reporting for better research: a checklist for reproducibility

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
42 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Better reporting for better research: a checklist for reproducibility
Published in
Genome Biology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-015-0710-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amye Kenall, Scott Edmunds, Laurie Goodman, Liz Bal, Louisa Flintoft, Daniel R Shanahan, Tim Shipley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 64 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 2 3%
Lecturer 2 3%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 46 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 46 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,102,108
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#804
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,506
of 275,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#12
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.