You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Neolithic Life Reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-018-9379-x |
| Authors |
Gwenaëlle Goude, Domingo C. Salazar-García, Robert C. Power, Johanna Terrom, Maïté Rivollat, Marie-France Deguilloux, Marie-Hélène Pemonge, Matthieu Le Bailly, Guy Andre, Arnaud Coutelas, Anne Hauzeur |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 18 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,292,334
of 24,892,887 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#236
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,609
of 337,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,892,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.