↓ Skip to main content

Marine microbial biodiversity, bioinformatics and biotechnology (M2B3) data reporting and service standards

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Marine microbial biodiversity, bioinformatics and biotechnology (M2B3) data reporting and service standards
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40793-015-0001-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra ten Hoopen, Stéphane Pesant, Renzo Kottmann, Anna Kopf, Mesude Bicak, Simon Claus, Klaas Deneudt, Catherine Borremans, Peter Thijsse, Stefanie Dekeyzer, Dick MA Schaap, Chris Bowler, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Guy Cochrane

Abstract

Contextual data collected concurrently with molecular samples are critical to the use of metagenomics in the fields of marine biodiversity, bioinformatics and biotechnology. We present here Marine Microbial Biodiversity, Bioinformatics and Biotechnology (M2B3) standards for "Reporting" and "Serving" data. The M2B3 Reporting Standard (1) describes minimal mandatory and recommended contextual information for a marine microbial sample obtained in the epipelagic zone, (2) includes meaningful information for researchers in the oceanographic, biodiversity and molecular disciplines, and (3) can easily be adopted by any marine laboratory with minimum sampling resources. The M2B3 Service Standard defines a software interface through which these data can be discovered and explored in data repositories. The M2B3 Standards were developed by the European project Micro B3, funded under 7(th) Framework Programme "Ocean of Tomorrow", and were first used with the Ocean Sampling Day initiative. We believe that these standards have value in broader marine science.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Mexico 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Estonia 1 2%
Unknown 52 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Professor 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Computer Science 4 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#459
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,245
of 279,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.