↓ Skip to main content

Draft genome sequences of Chrysoporthe austroafricana, Diplodia scrobiculata, Fusarium nygamai, Leptographium lundbergii, Limonomyces culmigenus, Stagonosporopsis tanaceti, and Thielaviopsis…

Overview of attention for article published in IMA Fungus, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Draft genome sequences of Chrysoporthe austroafricana, Diplodia scrobiculata, Fusarium nygamai, Leptographium lundbergii, Limonomyces culmigenus, Stagonosporopsis tanaceti, and Thielaviopsis punctulata
Published in
IMA Fungus, June 2015
DOI 10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.01.15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda D. Wingfield, Peter K. Ades, Fatima A. Al-Naemi, Lisa A. Beirn, Wubetu Bihon, Jo Anne Crouch, Z. Wilhelm de Beer, Lieschen De Vos, Tuan A. Duong, Christopher J. Fields, Gerda Fourie, Aquillah M. Kanzi, Martha Malapi-Wight, Sarah J. Pethybridge, Osman Radwan, Gloria Rendon, Bernard Slippers, Quentin C. Santana, Emma T. Steenkamp, Paul W. J. Taylor, Niloofar Vaghefi, Nicolaas A. van der Merwe, Daniel Veltri, Michael J. Wingfield

Abstract

The genomes of Chrysoporthe austroafricana, Diplodia scrobiculata, Fusarium nygami, Leptographium lundbergii, Limonomyces culmigenus, Stagonosporopsis tanaceti, and Thielaviopsis punctulata are presented in this genome announcement. These seven genomes are from endophytes, plant pathogens and economically important fungal species. The genome sizes range from 26.6 Mb in the case of Leptographium lundbergii to 44 Mb for Chrysoporthe austroafricana. The availability of these genome data will provide opportunities to resolve longstanding questions regarding the taxonomy of species in these genera, and may contribute to our understanding of the lifestyles through comparative studies with closely related organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from IMA Fungus
#223
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,008
of 278,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMA Fungus
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.