↓ Skip to main content

Practice guideline of evidence-based medicine : Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (the PRISMA statement)

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Practice guideline of evidence-based medicine : Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (the PRISMA statement)
Published in
ADS, January 2011
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.54.254
Authors

Kyoko TAKU, Yoshitoku YOSHIDA, Toyonori OMORI

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Researcher 9 14%
Librarian 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 19 30%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 29%
Psychology 11 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 9 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,180,390
of 16,703,174 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#3,750
of 30,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,592
of 237,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#43
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,703,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.