↓ Skip to main content

Practice guideline of evidence-based medicine : Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (the PRISMA statement)

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Practice guideline of evidence-based medicine : Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (the PRISMA statement)
Published in
ADS, January 2011
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.54.254
Authors

Kyoko TAKU, Yoshitoku YOSHIDA, Toyonori OMORI

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
France 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Psychology 9 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Unspecified 4 10%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 9 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,513,683
of 12,819,602 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#4,577
of 18,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,535
of 233,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#12
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,819,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,544 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.