You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stimulated and unstimulated saliva samples have significantly different bacterial profiles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0198021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia Gomar-Vercher, Aurea Simón-Soro, José María Montiel-Company, José Manuel Almerich-Silla, Alex Mira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,343,728
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#53,198
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,343
of 345,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#866
of 3,263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.