↓ Skip to main content

The use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support in acetabular revision surgery: a 4- to 9-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support in acetabular revision surgery: a 4- to 9-year follow-up
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0222-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huifeng Ding, Yuanqing Mao, Bin Yu, Zhenan Zhu, Huiwu Li, Baoqing Yu, Jianming Huang

Abstract

Acetabular revision arthroplasty with major bone loss is one of the most difficult operations in orthopedic surgery. The goal of the study was to evaluate midterm clinical results of the use of morselized allografts with cemented cage support in revision total hip replacement. We identified 28 patients (29 hips) at an average follow-up of 73 months. Harris Hip Scores (HHS) were assessed before and after surgery. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were evaluated for restoration of the center of rotation, component migration, and graft incorporation. At follow-up, the mean HHS improved from 34 (range, 20-45) to 80 (range, 71-98) points. None of the components had been re-revised. On average, the revised hip center of rotation was improved significantly. Incorporation of the graft was complete in 23 hips. The midterm result of cage reconstruction with morselized bone allograft is relatively better than other studies using a similar cage construction. We believe we have three special modifications of this reconstruction technique that are beneficial for bone incorporation. These data confirm that acetabular reconstruction using morselized allografts and cemented acetabular cages is effective in the midterm as a treatment for acetabular loosening with massive bone deficiency.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,176,968
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#122
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,454
of 267,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.