↓ Skip to main content

Electrochemical tuning of capacitive response of graphene oxide

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP), January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrochemical tuning of capacitive response of graphene oxide
Published in
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP), January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c8cp03631d
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjin J. Gutić, Dževad K. Kozlica, Fehim Korać, Danica Bajuk-Bogdanović, Miodrag Mitrić, Vladimir M. Mirsky, Slavko V. Mentus, Igor A. Pašti

Abstract

The increasing energy demands of modern society require a deep understanding of the properties of energy storage materials, as well as the tuning of their performance. We show that the capacitance of graphene oxide (GO) can be precisely tuned using a simple electrochemical reduction route. In situ resistance measurements, in combination with cyclic voltammetry measurements and Raman spectroscopy, have shown that upon reduction GO is irreversibly deoxygenated, which is further accompanied by structural ordering and an increase in electrical conductivity. The capacitance is maximized when the concentration of oxygen functional groups is properly balanced with the conductivity. Any further reduction and deoxygenation leads to a gradual loss of capacitance. The observed trend is independent of the preparation route and the exact chemical and structural properties of GO. It is proposed that an improvement in the capacitive properties of any GO can be achieved by optimization of its reduction conditions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 16%
Engineering 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 9 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#10,182,494
of 13,337,884 outputs
Outputs from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP)
#3,763
of 8,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,438
of 270,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP)
#103
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,337,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,682 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.