Title |
Immune recognition of somatic mutations leading to complete durable regression in metastatic breast cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Medicine, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41591-018-0040-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nikolaos Zacharakis, Harshini Chinnasamy, Mary Black, Hui Xu, Yong-Chen Lu, Zhili Zheng, Anna Pasetto, Michelle Langhan, Thomas Shelton, Todd Prickett, Jared Gartner, Li Jia, Katarzyna Trebska-McGowan, Robert P. Somerville, Paul F. Robbins, Steven A. Rosenberg, Stephanie L. Goff, Steven A. Feldman |
Abstract |
Immunotherapy using either checkpoint blockade or the adoptive transfer of antitumor lymphocytes has shown effectiveness in treating cancers with high levels of somatic mutations-such as melanoma, smoking-induced lung cancers and bladder cancer-with little effect in other common epithelial cancers that have lower mutation rates, such as those arising in the gastrointestinal tract, breast and ovary1-7. Adoptive transfer of autologous lymphocytes that specifically target proteins encoded by somatically mutated genes has mediated substantial objective clinical regressions in patients with metastatic bile duct, colon and cervical cancers8-11. We present a patient with chemorefractory hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer who was treated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) reactive against mutant versions of four proteins-SLC3A2, KIAA0368, CADPS2 and CTSB. Adoptive transfer of these mutant-protein-specific TILs in conjunction with interleukin (IL)-2 and checkpoint blockade mediated the complete durable regression of metastatic breast cancer, which is now ongoing for >22 months, and it represents a new immunotherapy approach for the treatment of these patients. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 122 | 10% |
Spain | 57 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 34 | 3% |
Thailand | 28 | 2% |
Japan | 24 | 2% |
France | 17 | 1% |
India | 12 | 1% |
Australia | 11 | <1% |
Canada | 9 | <1% |
Other | 107 | 9% |
Unknown | 755 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 902 | 77% |
Scientists | 198 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 60 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1303 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 294 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 233 | 18% |
Student > Master | 121 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 91 | 7% |
Other | 84 | 6% |
Other | 196 | 15% |
Unknown | 284 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 269 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 174 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 166 | 13% |
Engineering | 30 | 2% |
Other | 145 | 11% |
Unknown | 331 | 25% |