↓ Skip to main content

How Cultural-Historical Activity Theory can Inform Interprofessional Team Debriefings

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Simulation in Nursing, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
How Cultural-Historical Activity Theory can Inform Interprofessional Team Debriefings
Published in
Clinical Simulation in Nursing, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.012
Authors

Walter Eppich, Adam Cheng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 23%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 19 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#12,734,387
of 21,604,059 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Simulation in Nursing
#390
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,370
of 248,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Simulation in Nursing
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,604,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.