↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

How Cultural-Historical Activity Theory can Inform Interprofessional Team Debriefings

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Simulation in Nursing, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
How Cultural-Historical Activity Theory can Inform Interprofessional Team Debriefings
Published in
Clinical Simulation in Nursing, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.012
Authors

Walter Eppich, Adam Cheng

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 16 27%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 23%
Social Sciences 10 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,760,537
of 13,973,339 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Simulation in Nursing
#217
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,176
of 234,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Simulation in Nursing
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,973,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.

This page is provided by Altmetric.