You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12955-018-0920-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marieke van Leeuwen, Olga Husson, Paola Alberti, Juan Ignacio Arraras, Olivier L. Chinot, Anna Costantini, Anne-Sophie Darlington, Linda Dirven, Martin Eichler, Eva B. Hammerlid, Bernhard Holzner, Colin D. Johnson, Meropi Kontogianni, Trille Kristina Kjær, Ofir Morag, Sandra Nolte, Andrew Nordin, Andrea Pace, Monica Pinto, Katja Polz, John Ramage, Jaap C. Reijneveld, Samantha Serpentini, Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski, Vassilios Vassiliou, Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw, Ingvild Vistad, Teresa E. Young, Neil K. Aaronson, Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse, on behalf of the EORTC QLG |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 10 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 17% |
| United States | 7 | 15% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 46% |
| Scientists | 14 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 418 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 9% |
| Researcher | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 161 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 15% |
| Psychology | 27 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 11% |
| Unknown | 172 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,082,966
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#43
of 2,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,136
of 345,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.